<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Our money and our valuables</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.tysonkirksey.com/2005/11/our-money-and-our-valuables/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.tysonkirksey.com/2005/11/our-money-and-our-valuables/</link>
	<description>Something funny should go here...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 04 Apr 2011 01:47:07 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim Henderson</title>
		<link>http://www.tysonkirksey.com/2005/11/our-money-and-our-valuables/comment-page-1/#comment-116</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim Henderson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Nov 2005 15:49:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tysonkirksey.com/?p=30#comment-116</guid>
		<description>I read the other day that the rich give away a higher percentage of their income than the poor or the middle class. I think that rich and poor, middle class and the rich need to change in many of their thought processes. You can be too rich and you can be too poor. I want to provide for my family (1 Tim 5.8), but I also do not want to train they to always want more. Paul had the right attitude (Philippians 4.11-12). Contentment is the value, but our whole society is driven by wanting more. Rich Mullins said it correctly: 

Everybody I know says they need just one thing 
And what they really mean is that they need just one thing more 
And everybody seems to think they&#039;ve got it coming 
Well I know that I don&#039;t deserve You 
Still I want to love and serve You more and more 
You&#039;re my one thing 

Tim
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I read the other day that the rich give away a higher percentage of their income than the poor or the middle class. I think that rich and poor, middle class and the rich need to change in many of their thought processes. You can be too rich and you can be too poor. I want to provide for my family (1 Tim 5.8), but I also do not want to train they to always want more. Paul had the right attitude (Philippians 4.11-12). Contentment is the value, but our whole society is driven by wanting more. Rich Mullins said it correctly: </p>
<p>Everybody I know says they need just one thing<br />
And what they really mean is that they need just one thing more<br />
And everybody seems to think they&#8217;ve got it coming<br />
Well I know that I don&#8217;t deserve You<br />
Still I want to love and serve You more and more<br />
You&#8217;re my one thing </p>
<p>Tim</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bryan Tarpley</title>
		<link>http://www.tysonkirksey.com/2005/11/our-money-and-our-valuables/comment-page-1/#comment-106</link>
		<dc:creator>Bryan Tarpley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Nov 2005 04:45:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tysonkirksey.com/?p=30#comment-106</guid>
		<description>Being a socialist at heart, I am naturally biased on this issue.  I know that there is such a thing as a responsible use of large amounts of money.  I also know that the have-nots can idolize money as much as the haves.  I still can&#039;t get rid of my instinctive negative reaction to the idea of being materialistically rich.  There is something inherent in the gospel which favors the poor.  I think what I&#039;m supposed to say here is that it depends on the person.  I&#039;m supposed to say that the rich young ruler needed to give up his possesions not because he had them but because he idolized them.  I still can&#039;t shake the eye of the needle verse.  I still think that the ideal would be to spend the meat of one&#039;s days doing something other than acquiring wealth.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Being a socialist at heart, I am naturally biased on this issue.  I know that there is such a thing as a responsible use of large amounts of money.  I also know that the have-nots can idolize money as much as the haves.  I still can&#8217;t get rid of my instinctive negative reaction to the idea of being materialistically rich.  There is something inherent in the gospel which favors the poor.  I think what I&#8217;m supposed to say here is that it depends on the person.  I&#8217;m supposed to say that the rich young ruler needed to give up his possesions not because he had them but because he idolized them.  I still can&#8217;t shake the eye of the needle verse.  I still think that the ideal would be to spend the meat of one&#8217;s days doing something other than acquiring wealth.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

