This was fun stuff…Bill O’Reilly went on Dave’s show last night, and spent about 10 minutes going back and forth about Iraq, Christmas and Cindy Sheehan. Now these are two men that I enjoy watching, for different reasons of course, so I was very intriqued with the conversation. It’s sad that the blogosphere was filled with meat-heads blobbering on about how Letterman destroyed O’Reilly, or O’Reilly couldn’t handle Dave, or this or that. It’s all nonsense. Letterman did nothing but change the subject and shoot off quick one-liners that he knew would draw an applause, regardless of the fact that they had nothing to do with the debate. Here’s an example:
Letterman: “See, I’m very concerned about people like yourself who don’t have nothing but endless sympathy for a woman like Cindy Sheehan. Honest to Christ.” [audience applause]
O’Reilly: “No, I’m sorry.”
Letterman: “Honest to Christ.”
O’Reilly: “No way. [waits for applause to die down] No way you’re going to get me, no way that a terrorist who blows up women and children.”
Letterman: “Do you have children?”
O’Reilly: “Yes I do. I have a son the same age as yours. No way a terrorist who blows up women and children is going to be called a ‘freedom fighter’ on my program.” [mild audience applause]
Letterman: “I’m not smart enough to debate you point to point on this, but I have the feeling, I have the feeling about 60 percent of what you say is crap. [audience laughter] But I don’t know that for a fact. [more audience applause]
I thought O’Reilly was respectful, but it will be very interesting to see what Bill says tonight on his show, when Dave isn’t there to defend himself. While my respect for O’Reilly has been waning in recent months, he’s obviously in a different league than Lettermen when it comes to debate. Dave, stick to the jokes. Bill, stick to the facts.
Tyson Politics